Intro
I’ve been a FP4 user for about nine months, and am mostly happy with it. I’m pleased that if I damage the screen, I can service it myself; I accidentally smashed two Honor screens in the space of as many years. I am in the UK.
For a long time I made do without a hands-free kit, as I don’t make as many calls as I used to. The lack of audio port is annoying, but I understand why manufacturers are moving away from them.
Fairbuds problems
I recently had a need to replace the screen protector, having smashed that too. While buying a new one, I decided to try the “Fairbuds True Wireless Earbuds White v2”, to fill my hands-free gap. I now feel that I’ve made rather a foolish error. The Fairphone website acknowledges the 14 days I get in the UK as cooling-off period for distance selling. Unfortunately I was away with work and missed the deadline (I received them 7th May, so 21st would have been the fortnight point).
Broadly the buds seem to have so many problems, I fear they are not actually a finished product. I will try a run-down:
- They don’t seem to stay in my ears.
- The output sound is reedy and tinny, and would be more suited to a £40 product, not one costing three times as much. I am probably quite fussy here, and maybe I have just overestimated what IEMs can do.
- The microphone seems to be poor for calls compared to headphones with an in-lead mic.
- The app barely has any features (for example, I can’t find a way to control the noise cancellation in the app).
The battery symbols in the app say ‘N/A’, which I assume is because of some kind of Bluetooth communication error. Music will still play in the buds though, so they’re operational after a fashion.Needed location servicesThe Fairbud firmware version is marked as ‘N/A’ in the app (same possible reason as above).Needed location services- If I turn off Bluetooth and then turn it back on, the app still thinks the buds are disconnected, and I have to restart the app to get it to see the new state.
The app equaliser rarely works. I think it worked once, but mostly it has no effect on the frequency response output at all.Needed location services- The tap/swipe features on the buds themselves take a second to register, and it doesn’t always read the intended operation correctly. Getting the buds to do what one wants can be an intensely infuriating experience.
- With the tap/swipe features being so poor, I’d rather switch off those features, so at least I can fight with the poor fitting in my ears. But the app does not offer this, so I have to carefully handle the buds without touching the primary exposed surface.
I am aware that the reviews of the app on Google Play are a mixed bag.
What have I not tried?
- I’ve not done much research on the problems that other people are having, including potential solutions.
- I’ve not tried whether the various noise reduction modes would help the microphone’s performance (partly because it’s so fiddly to change them).
- I’ve not uninstalled and reinstalled the app.
- I’ve only read a couple of posts in this forum.
This is not laziness. There is a point where a product is so inadequate for the price point that it’s not a good use of time to optimistically hope that every category failure can be resolved. This is an early prototype that, as far as I can see, only has repairability going for it.
I plan to get an inline USB C to DAC/audio adapter. With the benefit of hindsight, I should have done that to start with.
Support times
On an unrelated issue I logged a support call on 15th January and received a request for clarifications a month later (!) on 14th February. I found a way to self-resolve, but I wanted to mention this as to why I am raising the issue in the forum. I am aware that FP have posted here to say they know support cases are backing up, and that the service is not at an acceptable level.
Refund
I would like to pursue a refund, perhaps under the cooling-off period with some goodwill attached. I acknowledge my complaint is a bit late. I am hoping that some leniency can be applied and trust that it is clear why giving up with the product is the correct solution in this case.
Failing that, perhaps the lengthy set of problems can permit me a refund under a faulty product reason code. I think it would be a waste of time to try another set though: unfortunately I think a replacement set would be just as poor.