I had thought this was only a security update from god. But I note you have carrier specific updates.
My query is that usually the updates are provided via the carrier hence the delays when a carrierās update has to be delayed. However I got this update on a SIM free phone only connected to WiFi i.e. no network update.
So was this a Fairphone push, avoiding networks, and you monitor my phone as soon as it connects to the internet; as if it were pure google it would be pushed to all Android 10 phones presumably.
So where do these update come from. I understood Fairphone made them and then checked with the network/carriers that they worked before there was any option to download.
Hi, there was one vote from Vodafone Italy that fairphone still works there has anyone in Germany with Vodafone tried this update yet? And did not receive the Nocaller ID again?
I stopped the update for now āEntwickleroptionenā, but as I read it, it should be made due to security reasons.
vut I donāt get, that RAE writes it would also do something to Carrier thingsā¦
The minimum brightness issue was rolled back on the 0132 (5th Nov) update so that it is not so dark at the minimum setting and the adaptive brightness works as expected. The 0134 (16th Nov)does nothing to either of these issues.
Thanks for the explanation, but you should not present an incidental failure (a bug, too bright backlit at minimal setting) as achievement. v132 (5. Nov) update did not recover an exact previous state (because now the adaptive brightness kinda works), that is not what the word ārollbackā mean ya?.
We folks here are still awaiting for a brightness fix: We were so releived by the update preceding the v132 before the v132 just made FP3 too loud for eyes in a dark environments again. At least now we know the developers are aware. Can we perhaps have a switch, a setting in Developers menu to choose between āthe minimal brightness is pleasantā and āthe brightness auto-adjustment worksā states?
As far as I know this was only a problem for some people, it was not a problem for me or my daughter.
As far as I can tell it is exactly that, a roll back, as the adaptive brightness now works exactly as it did before.
Iām not sure who you are addressing this too, as this is a user forum, and as I said there are not āmanyā complaints about the brightness. Out of the hundreds of thousands of FP3s sold I can count those with either sensitive eyes or faulty phone regarding the brightness on two hands (I think)
Then you havenāt been paying attention, because many people have complained, from the release of the phone to the latest update discussions, that the minimum brightness setting is too high.
Well we clearly disagree on what the word āmanyā means. Note I put it in quotes so as not to be definitive. Letās put it another way I imagine thereās if there is 20 then that equates to 1 in 10,000 users. I would call that not many.
If it were 200 ??? ~} really ~ it would still be 1 in 1000 and
even if it were 2,000 it would still only be 1% and I would say that is not many.
And whether that is down to sensitive eyes or faulty phones isnāt known in any case let alone in each case.
The first thread about this problem from October 2019, Lowest brightness is too bright, gathered 4.1k views. Many people were looking for a solution to this problem, because the minimum brightnes is just way too high - also compared to like every other phone. I donāt know any other phone that has a minimum brightness of 27 nits.
Have you ever used your phone in complete darkness?
How one defines many or how one is affected by brithness is not the topic here and very individual. This update was just a security patch. FP heard the voices of those having issues with minimal brigthness and is working on a solution.