Screen seems so stupidly sensitive at edges. Holding it normally(I have come from a long line of cheap Motorolaâs) blocks screen inputs due to proximity of holding fingers. Think this may also effect the pay sensor some how, it can take ages to get vendors units to accept payment.
Itâs no good going on about chipsets etc. Most buyers arenât nerds. This is the most Iâve ever paid for a phone by a factor of 2/3 and itâs not impressive.
I have been a bit nervous when migrating from my Pixel 4a to the Fairphone.
I was quite fed up with the USB-Port on the Pixel 4a of my wife going to hell, and i know my way into the guts of smartphones and laptops - so the switch to the Fairphone 4 just made sense. My wife upgraded to the Pixel 6, and i got the Fairphone 4.
Just as the reviews (from i.e notebookcheck.com) suggested, the Fairphone 4 is well built and has a fine mid-range SOC with enough RAM to last the next few Android upgrades Also, switching from the âvanilla-Pixelâ Android to the Fairphone builds was painless - no bloat or âwe need to change something to be differentâ changes to the OS.
However the reviews regarding the FP4-Camera were worrying to me. My wife is a photographer, and we both share this as a passion.The Pixel cameras (2, 4a and now the 6) were really nice to capture good pictures without having to worry about lighting and focus - which is handy when you want to snap pictures of your kids âin the momentâ.
I was pleasantly surprised with the FP4 Camera so far. I managed to get good pictures, sometimes even better than the pixel6. Only when it is a bit dim, the Pixel6 manages to avoid too long exposure a bit better, so the subject wont have motion blur. But, while shooting the Halloween tour in the dark outside, i was really surprised to see me getting better pictures than the pixel 6.
So, yes, i am very satisfied with my upgrade from the pixel4a to the FP4.
Voted very satisfied. Coming from hTc U+ and their âflagshipsâ during 12 years, FP4 of curse is something else, but nevertheless Iâm very satisfied. Not only with the phone itself but also the concept.
I moved from a Nokia 7.2 to FP4, this is the most expensive phone I ever bought.
Overall I am satisfied with the phone.
- I donât miss the audio connector, I got an adapter and also a headset with USB C connection.
- Battery life is fine with me.
- In the beginning the FP4 felt huge compared to the Nokia but I got used to it.
- The fingerprint sensor and its location are good for me. I had to turn off the feature to turn on the Phone when touching the sensor because it turned on too often when I didnât want it to.
- The algorithm for screen orientation is too sensitive IMHO, I turned auto rotation off.
- Camera is pretty good and has improved with updates using stock camera app.
- The only disappointing thing is voice quality of phone calls. I hope that they can improve it with a future update.
OK there are two things to consider.
a) Itâs called the Fairphone due to the attention paid to miners and factory workers, so most of the extra cost goes there, hopefully
b) Being also touted as a DIY repairable phone it definitely will attract a higher percentage of ânerdsâ
Although I am overwhelmingly a fairtrade freak I am a bit of a nerd too, so the fairphone itâs an opportunity I would not miss.
However I would hope the issue of fairtrade is the overriding factor and the nerds can sit in the second row.
But a painful truth is that the majority of people are not concerned with fairtrade and only see the power of the money in their pockets.
Fairtrade is expensive and can only become more so.
Donât get me wrong, the fairtrade aspect is great, but the main selling point for most users is the long software support and repairability. Which inadvertently attracts nerds. If it was just about fairtrade but otherwise it was the same glued brick with 2 years of updates, nobody would buy it.
Thanks for the Fair trade lecture, whoâd of known!!!
If a phone is significantly crapper for twice as much money then it brings the FT âbrandâ into disrepute. That is is an abject failure.
OK
a) where did you get the idea that the main selling point is âlong software support and repairability.â
b) I have phone 10 years old that work fine but donât have Wi-Fi calling and that was an âessentialâ feature. But there are many other phones cheaper and the only reason I bought is fairtrade.
c) So yes I would have bought a glued brick if it had been âfair tradeâ as all the phones Iâve had have lasted a min of six years with absolutely no problems.
Thatâs my point, money is the key to most peoples motivation. Thatâs where a few nerds can help as they have other motivations, hopefully other than saving money or having to earn more.
As far as âdisreputeâ as you noted it a laughing matter.
Self respect
I voted satisfied, bordering on neutral. It has a few annoyances that slowly drive me mad but overall Iâm satisfied, Iâd say.
- I canât hold the phone in my hand when Iâm out in the sun and in a phone call, because it keeps turning the screen off. Itâs been like this for upwards of 8 months now and Iâm blown away by the fact it hasnât been fixed yet
- The default camera app is meh in semi-low light areas. This would normally be okay for me, but the missing CameraX API means my Gcam app canât live up to its full potential. So do I essentially stop using one of the 2 cameras or do I get inferior picture quality? I chose Gcam.
- Iâll believe we are getting Android 12 this year when I see it. Iâve seen no mentioning of a public beta, and that typically comes months before the official release.
I bought it for the 5 years of Android update support + the replaceable battery. So far, Iâm pretty meh on the battery life and pretty negative to the Android update support. Iâd rate the phone a 6/10, where 5/10 is average. Most of this comes from me having used a Pixel 6a in a store. The Pixel 6a sells for 200 bucks less than the Fairphone 4, and it felt like using a rocketship in comparison.
I get that the hardware being repairable will have some severe cutbacks when it comes to performance and I was fully expecting that.
⊠However, I wasnât expecting the software support to be this bad
Iâm satisfied, but Iâve been running iodĂ© since the first or so week.
Seit Anfang Oktober besitze ich das Fairphone 4. Hier sind meine ersten EindrĂŒcke:
- Hardware / Software: da ich mein Smartphone ausschlieĂlich geschĂ€ftlich nutze und mit der Kamera nur SchnappschĂŒsse mache, komme ich mit dem Fairphone-Set Up sehr gut klar. Gewicht und GröĂe sind fĂŒr mich unerheblich, es ist schnell, ruckelt nicht, Telefonie ist gut verstĂ€ndlich. Ich habe den Microsoft Launcher geladen und habe damit eine âMicrosoft-kompatibleâ OberflĂ€che.
- e/OS: ZunĂ€chst einmal einen herzlichen Dank an die Fairphone Community. Ăberhaupt ist diese Community fĂŒr mich die beste, die ich bisher im Netz gesehen habe, was Information und WertschĂ€tzung untereinander betrifft. Mit den verschiedenen Links war es selbst fĂŒr mich recht leicht möglich, e/OS zu installieren. GefĂŒhlt ist mein Fairphone 4 jetzt ohne google âschlankerâ und schneller als vorher. e/OS lĂ€uft absolut stabil.
- und noch etwas: um nicht den Audio-Klinkenadapter extra bei Fairphone bestellen zu mĂŒssen, kaufte ich bei meinem HĂ€ndler einen Samsung-Adapter USB c auf Klinke (wenig Geld investiert, um es auszuprobieren). Es funktionierte natĂŒrlich nicht. Mit dem Umstieg auf e/OS wurde der Adapter von meinem Fairphone erkannt und ich kann meine Musik hören - a very nice âside effectâ.
Alles in allem bin ich sehr zufrieden, zum ersten Mal ein âvernĂŒnftigesâ Smartphone zu besitzen. Mit dem GerĂ€t wie mit der UnterstĂŒtzung im Forum.
Update:
Ich habe gestern mein e/OS aktualisiert und seit dem lÀuft mein Fairphone 4 mit Android 12.
I have owned the Fairphone 4 since the beginning of October. Here are my first impressions:
- Hardware / software: as I use my smartphone exclusively for business and only take snapshots with the camera, I get on very well with the Fairphone set-up. Weight and size are irrelevant to me, it is fast, does not jerk, telephony is well understood. I have loaded the Microsoft Launcher and thus have a âMicrosoft-compatibleâ interface.
- e/OS: First of all, many thanks to the Fairphone community. In general, this community is the best I have seen on the net so far in terms of information and appreciation for each other. With the various links, it was quite easy even for me to install e/OS. It feels like my Fairphone 4 is now âslimmerâ and faster than before without google. e/OS runs absolutely stable.
- and one more thing: in order not to have to order the audio jack adapter extra from Fairphone, I bought a Samsung adapter USB c to jack from my dealer (little money invested to try it out). It didnât work, of course. With the switch to e/OS, the adapter was recognised by my Fairphone and I can listen to my music - a very nice âside effectâ.
All in all, I am very happy to have a âdecentâ smartphone for the first time. With the device as well as with the support in the forum.
Update:
I updated my e/OS yesterday and since then my Fairphone 4 is running Android 12.
Looool this is brilliant!
I voted satisfied. In general Iâm very happy with it and I can see myself keeping it for a long time.
I only have three areas where Iâm disappointed:
- The camera is bad but passable. Itâs possible to get good photos but not of anything thatâs moving or in low light.
- The device is too big. I understand their reasons, and accept that it is the standard these days, but whenever I pick up my work-issued iPhone, it feels so much more manageable. Some people have said they have gotten used to this, as have I, but I am not going to move away from my opinion that smaller is better.
- Stock Android 11 doesnât feel modern. I am hoping Android 12 improves this. There are other software problems, but honestly I have never had an Android (including the big players) where there arenât some software problems.
But overall I have a reliable phone and I would not change it.
Android 12 will provide one hand mode, which makes the size more manageable.
Unfortunately that isnât going to solve 99% of the problems I have with the size, such as the weight distribution, the physical width of the device in hand, or the discomfort in my trouser pockets. But I accept it would allow me to use the device one-handed, which I canât currently without accidental touches.
To be fair I do use the official case which adds some bulk.
I voted very unsatisfied. Iâve been using FP4 since April 2022. I would return it if I could, or give it to some friend, but of course, people would laugh when they saw this brick. There are multiple reasons, starting from non-existent software support (whereâs the Android 12-13? and Iâm still on Sept 2022 security update), the potato camera, random reboots (seems to be related to roaming and SIM/operator combo), no headphone jack, weight, shape, lack of accessories, eSIM, operator support (I donât have VoLTE or 5G working despite my operator supporting it), overall cheep feeling of the device, despite the price. The list goes on. Just to be clear, Iâm on stock firmware, not rooted and with a locked bootloader.
Hereâs my review on Amazon: Amazon.de
Edit: re-reading my review, Iâm considering putting this phone in a drawer and getting something modern and supported. So much for sustainability.
Hi Jorge although you are clearly grossly disappointed I am curious about the content
-
Brick you donât mean software type and unusable but in terms of size and weight general disappointment which weighs heavy on you.
-
With this heavy burden you encounter
- I imagine you knew the price was related to the Fair Trade aspect and consequently it would be a state of the art phone and that you may have serious misgiving when using it with anything other than moderate expectations.
Weight This info was available before purchase so that surely was expected, or had you not checks the specs.
- I imagine you knew the price was related to the Fair Trade aspect and consequently it would be a state of the art phone and that you may have serious misgiving when using it with anything other than moderate expectations.
-
Same with headphone jack, clearly noted in the sales specs
-
e-SIM I would have thought if someone wanted to use an e-SIM they would check compatibility before purchasing a phone
-
Functionality with certain carriers seems to be an issue and again that can be discovered on purchase and the phone returned if it doesnât work well or well enough in your area.
-
OS security etc. clearly slow to be pushed but doesnât brick the phone
And Iâm sure the list does go on, but clearly your experience is just that, yours.
My daughter seems happy with hers, I have 2 FP3s. And although akin to you in that I would not recommend a Fairphone to anyone other that a Fair Trade Freak I wouldnât give it a bad review as that just seems a waste of more resources.
On the matter of wasted resources, putting in a draw is a great example of waste.
You could advertise it here and get some funds for a new phone. You may even get enough to cover a new one.
Giving it to a friend I agree, would be embarrassing, I wouldnât do that even with one of my seemingly perfect FP3s but Iâm sure I could find someone that would appreciate your FP4
All the best and that for pouring out your heart
Please, stop with this one liner that makes no sense in the context discussed. This starts to become embarrassing, so many people have issues with this phone. You cannot tell everyone that your daughter is happy with the phone and others should be as well. What @Jorge lists are issues everyone can reproduce. Granted, some of them were known in advance such as the headphone jack.
But updates delayed for such a long period may not brick your phone, but for sure are a huge security issue. An example:
These issues need to be addressed. For some this phone may not be worth more than a brick indeed due to FP failing to fix them. Itâs been a year. Surely we can expect improvements, even the small issues like the jumping arrows hasnât been fixed. Instead, they add another notification bar issue by not testing their landscape change which now cuts of icons.
FP needs to hear this feedback and should not be sugarcoated or downplayed. Otherwise they will never improve their products. This feedback is intended to make these devices more usable during our day to day tasks. We know itâs not an iPhone. But we did pay good money for it, it should also be fair for the end user.
Sure it must be embarrasing for some, it is for me and I donât even have one. Just reading it is not pleasant, but as I said not everyone will have the same experience. Maybe Iâll ask my daughter to post a comment, but you may know how it is ~ those with no problems donât often visit the forum, if ever.
As for âgoodâ money, thereâs no such thing in my opinion but where it is used does show something about the user.
Take care