Don’t get me wrong I value your statements much higher than mine… but do you know this for a fact (I’m really asking)?
I certainly don’t because … and that’s the very issue here. … In my opinion Fairphone’s information offerings are extremely sparse when it comes to transparency about their customer/company doings.
The issue is the same for expoena but here on the example of technical support…
Whenever I approach Fairphone support (and I have to do this a lot unfortunately), I always get forwarded to Zendesk servers (that’s a fact). So no “support.fairphone.com” but “fairphone.zendesk.com”. I mean, they don’t even try to hide it like others (see cloudfront customers etc)
So even when communication between FP customers and FP support is confidential, i.e. encrypted (which I doubt), I’m pretty sure Zendesk has still the master key to decryption and thus to all of my private (definitely meta) data… like all the other cloud software service providers out there, too. Even though technically that’s not exactly outsourcing, practically it is for me.
… and even if the support team is actually also FP staff (which I doubt), the critical parts (FP looses grip on their own core business skills and pays with customer data) which are what makes outsourcing for me troubling, still exist.
Furthermore my doubt is based on the communication with FP support. Often I only get standard text block respones and when I ask for more specifics or ask for a solution for my problem that is better suited to me personally I always get a “no can do” or other “that’s not a standard solution, so we deny it as a matter of principle”. For me that always feels like the person (or human chat bot) I’m talking with has virtually no insight or authorization wrt. Fairphone’s core business.
In my (much smaller) company (than Fairphone) I work a lot with our own support team. We don’t use any third party services, every customer is addressed as if they’re our only and most important customer, we only do individual problem solutions, and sometimes they’re even passed to the person in charge directly (like the developer who created a certain part of our products). I don’t expect that from Fairphone but at least be transparent about it.
…and before I hijack this thread even more, I better stop.
tl;dr: IMO FP is depending to much on (proprietary) third party business solutions which is contradictory to general sustainability and FP should be at least more transparent about it, so that there can be a public discussion about it.