Now, I apologise if this comes off as negative and grumpy… so let me first say I still think the FairPhone is an awesome project, and am a firm believer in the cause. And I don’t want to lose my faith… but I am struggling
The candid “ask me about…” flyer that came with it inspired me to spread the word until I actually turned the thing on. And yes, I have been approached by lots of friends fascinated to hear there is a Fair trade phone you can get, and always have to deliver the same sad message to them: “Hold on to your money, because you definitely do NOT want this phone at this point in time. But fingers crossed things will improve in the next update.”
As much as it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling to own this item, it doesn’t make up for the fact that it is a device that frustrates and annoys me every time I use it. There’s numerous bugs I won’t list here, but the one show-stopper (and I think everyone would agree with me on this) is the ghost touch screen issue. A device which adds semi-random noise to the user’s input just should never have left the factory, period.
Because of this, it is quite demoralising to see an update ship without the most serious bug addressed, and the only comment on it being a suggested work-around that doesn’t seem to make any difference whatsoever. With no details about why this issue couldn’t be addressed next to all the minor software bugs listed.
Moreover, as someone employed in the electronics business I know a bit about how the supply chain works and how little control over the hardware/software stack vendors sometimes have. If most of the touch screen’s random behaviour is due to either hardware or firmware components that aren’t under your control, then I guess there’s little that actually can be done about this issue.
(No, this is not another make-it-more-open-source-rant. As much as I like the FOSS ideals next to the Fair trade ones, what ultimately matters for my personal pocket computer is that it works predictably, not the fine print of the source code access and licensing terms)
If it is the case that this crippling bug cannot be fixed and I just have to give up on it, bite the bullet and get a brand that works, then I’d want to know that sooner rather than later. Yes, it was an expensive purchase, but I guess I funded a great dream to make fairer devices, and will absorb the cost and move on with a “hey, at least it was a valiant effort which I contributed to”.
Likewise, if the FP2s modularity is the only way to rescue it now, by providing owners with a new touch screen that actually works, then I’d really want to know that as well. Even if it means us having to spend more money to get a new screen (thoroughly tested this time I hope!). Sure, it won’t look very good for the sustainability profile to bin a major piece of the phone due to manufacturing faults. But again, I knew I was putting my money into a risky project of passion and am fine with accepting a setback… as long as there is a plan forward.
Again, I do not question the Fairphone team’s commitment to the cause, and understand that ambitious projects sometimes fail even with the best intentions in place. It’s the awful silence and lack of openness about this that is really disturbing, and I just want to know whether there is a future for my FP2?