You know what scares us about big tech? Planned obsolescence

Originally published at: You know what scares us about big tech? Planned obsolescence. - Fairphone

In the spirit of Halloween, let’s talk about something truly chilling in the electronics industry: planned obsolescence. Beyond the tricky spelling, the real horror lies in how common it’s become. When companies design products to expire on purpose, there’s a serious problem.

IS THERE ACTUAL EVIDENCE OF COMPANIES DOING THIS?

There have been actual legal cases where a few major smartphone brands have been accused of purposely slowing down devices and causing performance issues with firmware and software updates. The official line was that this was done to prevent unexpected device shutdowns because of aging batteries. However, their customers saw it as a way for these brands to push newer devices on them. Lawsuits were filed, consumer watchdogs in countries like France and Italy stepped in, and heavy fines were levied.

WHAT ELSE COMES UNDER PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE?

The above cases are instances of devices being slowed down on purpose through OTA and firmware updates. But it goes further—planned obsolescence is built into the very design of most smartphones today. This is what we mean.

  • Repair is difficult and expensive:

A quick visit to iFixit’s website will give you an idea of what we’re talking about. Most flagship devices score between 4 and 7 out of 10. This means moderate difficulty in self-repair due to proprietary screws, glued components, and the integration of parts like screens and sensors. When adhesives and fragile glass backs come into play, the score drops even further. In comparison, Fairphone has been scoring a perfect 10 every time since the Fairphone 2 onwards.

Then there’s the issue of parts pairinga practice where specific components within a smartphone are linked to its motherboard using unique serial numbers or software locks. Parts pairing severely limits the ability of independent repair shops to fix devices. Shops without access to the proprietary software tools necessary to “pair” parts cannot fully repair or replace these components without causing functionality issues. As a result, repair costs tend to be higher, as only official service centers have access to pairing tools.

  • Non-removable batteries have become the norm

When smartphones first appeared, batteries were always removable. Then, over time, more and more manufacturers started gluing down the batteries (and their phones) in an effort to improve their weatherproofing. While a higher IP rating should have helped in extending the device’s life, sealing the batteries up ironically caused people to replace their devices when the battery capacity dropped. We’re talking barely two to three years.

  • Shorter software support windows don’t help either.

Most major manufacturers have started supporting their newer devices for four to five years with major software updates and security patches. However, older models tend to get ignored when it comes to support, and when they do receive updates, there are usually complaints of slowed performance, Google is better at this than the competition, upping their support window to seven years with their latest devices. Of course, this was after we announced a whopping eight-year support window for the Fairphone 5. Longer support windows and more software updates go a long way in encouraging people to keep their devices for longer.

The most problematic consequence of planned obsolescence is one we keep harping onthe rising tide of electronic waste. Roughly 50 million metric tons of electronic waste is generated annually, and smartphones contribute a large portion of that due to unnecessary and avoidable upgrades.

SO WHAT CAN BE DONE?

Some countries have been pushing to counter planned obsolescence for a while now. Since 2015, France has an anti-obsolescence law that mandates fines for erring companies. It requires transparency on repairability through a “repairability index” for consumer electronics. The index tells people how easy or hard it is to repair a device. (Again, the Fairphone 5 sits quite high on the list with a 9.3 rating.)

Meanwhile, the EU’s recently adopted “Right to Repair” directive mandates manufacturers to ensure spare parts availability at a reasonable price and facilitating ease of repair. Use of second-hand or 3D-printed spare parts by independent repairers is protected and encouraged, while companies cannot refuse to repair devices that were previously repaired by external repair centers or technicians. Member states of the EU have till 2026 to pass the directive’s recommendations as actual law.

On an individual level, we can always battle the consequences of planned obsolescence by choosing devices and brands that encourage using your device for longer. Remember, the most sustainable phone is the one you already own. Stick to the device you have for as long as possible. Don’t fall for the industry hype. Especially with Black Friday coming up.

7 Likes

Man, I’m looking forward to the day where phones will have to use user-replaceable batteries again. We’re slowly getting there thanks to the EU.

2 Likes

Not really, no smartphone will need to have a user replaceable battery, as long as the manufacture guaranties a sufficient capacity of 83% after 500 or 80% after 1000 full cycles.

Hence the word slowly. It’s a start at least.

If, for example, the processor or memory is clocked lower, then it ages more slowly? :thinking::smile:

Don’t give them ideas.

The manufacturer can’t make that guarantee without stipulating that the battery is never discharged below a critical level - usually around 10%. If you repeatedly full-discharge a Li-ion battery (which more than a few people tend to do) its life is significantly reduced, so you will still end up with otherwise good devices with knackered batteries!

EU regulations will not make much of a difference because manufacturers of phones and other electronic devices got some exceptions. When a phone or other device with a battery is specifically intended for use in or near water, a replaceable battery need not be included nor will there be the requierement of an easy replaceble battery. Also, if a direct connection between battery and the rest of the device is in place the manufacturer does not have to comply with the regulations. There will be also an exception if the safety of the (average) user can not be guaranteed. If that is the case, batteries have to be replaced by professional or certified (and expensive) repairers. The likely consequence of it all will be that in the near future even more phones will have fully enclosed cases that are waterproof, can’t be opened by the user and will be wireless charging only. Also, expect more fully glued and fully soldered in batteries in new phones. Many manufacturers will also continue to tell consumers that is will be very dangerous to replace batteries themselves.

Planned obsolescence from big tech doesn’t scare me. It makes me unamused by what humans in power are doing.

This is increasing child labor deaths when more cobalt is unsafely mined to replace old products that do not last as long anymore. Not only is big tech contributing to child deaths, it’s amplifying it. Anger is what I feel towards big tech from dead children. Not fear. I do not feel any sympathy for those from big tech who allow children to die. Destruction of Earth that has limited resources and ruthlessly exploited children are why I hate big tech.

Until big tech stops reeking with pathological greed and virtue signalling from dishonest advertisements, I will not trust it.

The Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania, and whatever else have been complicit in big tech business. They feign civilization when it’s actually pathologically greedy narcissists ruining Earth’s environment for profit versus decent people’s heads not far up their own butts.

Right now, all countries became a morally bankrupt cyberpunk dystopia where the internet is a privacy nightmare when corrupt governments that profit from blood money through child labor deaths are spying on people through mass surveillance. I don’t want a government that allowed child labor deaths for profit to spy on me. It’s child abuse for blood money. That’s why I’ll never trust any government. Especially when mass surveillance is a human rights violation anyway. So, I don’t take these modern developed countries seriously when people talk about how civilized they are. They aren’t civilized. They’re selling big tech products through unethical treatment of workers who have died when their deaths could have been avoided. It’s wealth-hoarding big tech overlords versus expendable workers. It’s not a bright future for everyone.