Rearranging Categories (again)

[Stefan]

@paulakreuzer

E.g.: I don’t feel the articles for the Café sub-categories. Especially “ The Software”.

Do you want to discriminate the little article??? I’m not insisting on it, but at least for phone and company it would make it clear that the category is not about each and every phone, but about Fairphone’s product. I’m fine without it, too.

@paulakreuzer

Modules & Peripherals

Why do you think we need this separate from FP2 help?

Oh, do you mean that we simply should have a structure like this, where issues with the Google-infected OS and with the hardware go into a “general” FP2 subcategory of help (like it is now with FP2 Help)? Visual:

Super category	Sub-category
Help (mostly individual requests)	FP1 FP2 (OS with Google / hardware issues) OpenOS LineageOS Alternative OSes

I first thought that there should be one Android 6 category and one hardware category, but this setup is probably better from a non-technically-inclined FP2 user’s perspective (reason: how should one know from the first moment whether it is software or hardware failure?).

@paulakreuzer

To avoid confusion (is this a guide or not?) we could make a super category for all wikis and a sub-category for wikis.

Since the ✏ List of local repair shops that are familiar with Fairphones (by City) is not a guide per-se, I’d put it where people in need would find it helpful: the Help category. The Help super category should host all such topics that aren’t guides, but are still relevant for both FP1 and FP2 (can’t think of many other topics atm).

Let me post another revised structure

Super-Category	Sub-Category
Community	Local DIY Developing Beta
Café	(The?) Company (The?) Phone Software & Apps Blogs?
Help	FP1 FP2 LineageOS OpenOS Alternative OSes
Guides
Market	Wanted Offered
Meta	[…]

Please give feedback on the remaining question marks (?).