An update on Fairphone 3

[anon9989719]

@DeepSea

I would not have to care to be friendly to you, because I already knew that you do not mind to be treated badly. In fact, we should respect each other…

I have a separate thread, exactly for that purpose, which I can’t imagine you missed @Alain_Guillet @DeepSea

The Fairness of the Fairphone

I think your basic intentions are quite clear: Consumers who have issues with their Fairphone(s) which are caused by Fairphone themselves shall be told that nothing was more important than a happy factory worker, no matter whether a consumer (who might have worked very hard to be able to buy a Fairphone) can afford to have a malfunctioning phone or not. Please accept that a consumer has the right to receive and to operate a working device within its warranty period. We could leave this discussi…

but just in case it’s not the place to be, that is there, some other place.

You don’t need to care or be friendly for/to me and I don’t want you to unless it’s to understand yourself, but to understand yourself your focus can be anywhere but if it’s external then it won’t last . . . .

You can not treat me badly, though you may think you can.

Sadly I may care for what appears external but that’s not it. The external only shows me how careless I am and I have no respect for nor want it from anyone. The notion of we is a trap to continued consumption, why would I want to further that.

I know I am not making sense to anyone but then I am only trying to understand and find the immortality amongst this decaying and decrepit game.