Thats a bit exaggerated dont you think?
Remind that device plans start 1-2 years before launch, what brings us to apprpx 2017 for the FP3.
Dont you think that such is acutually a reason to pick a rather rare SOC for the FP5, which shows FP actually still tries to improve longivity as much as possible and is still learning?
Such general thought-terminating cliches like “all against longivity, sustainability…” are actually the comments I meant above with negativity. Why focusing on what is not yet is perfect instead of seeing what was achieved already?