Well obviously then chickens will die out because they will all lay red junglefowl eggs.
No seriously: That’s exactly what I meant here:
If we say the core module is what determines which FP2 you have, then which part of the core module is most important? I’d say switching a sticker and some software code wouldn’t be enough to change the phone - you just made it hard to identify it (which was probably the purpose) - but I don’t know what on the other hand would be enough change.
From a circular economy standpoint:
- original FP (possibly with peripheral modules changed)
- upgraded original FP (with peripheral module(s) upgraded)
- reused original FP (with all data from the original user wiped)
- repaired original FP (possibly with parts on the core module exchanged for parts with same purpose)
- modified original FP (with DIY modifications made on the original core module in order to enhance something)
- refurbished like-new FP (made from broken original FP - sent back to factory where everything broken is repaired and replaced and the FP gets a new IMEI, a new battery, a factory reset and a new life)
- recycled new FP (theoretical FP made of all the shredded material of the original FP - which isn’t technically possible yet).
From a different understanding of originality standpoint:
- original FP (each FP ever sold by the company, no matter how many parts were replaced as long as they were replaced with equivalent parts from Fairphone)
- FP version 1.x (each FP ever sold by the company with upgraded modules as created by the company)
- forgery FP (phone created by a manufacturer that steals the blueprint of the FP and rebuilds a similar phone with the same tech specs, but probably doesn’t care about the fair aspects)
- facsimile FP (phone created by different manufacturer that tries to rebuild the FP as accurately as possible - so also with all the fair specs)
- derivative FP (phone built on the blueprint of the original FP, but with certain things changed deliberately - like this)