I dont think its “plain wrong”.
Computational photography is photography powered by software + AI, where the computer is as important as the lens.
1 Like
There might be some features that use neural networks (thus AI), but especialy the examples of @CuriousBread like HDR, are not of this category.
It seems that @CuriousBread indeed is correct in saying its already used or rather the future
Guys, this discussion has become quite unproductive. AI means something else for everyone and there’s no good im persuading others that your understanding is more “correct” than theirs.
Someone has AI = Neural nets. Someone has AI = LLMs. Someone has AI = Machine Learning. Someone has AI = State space exploration (this is what they teched me on uni and I must say I felt disappointed when they told me AI is A* search and friends).
In general, I’d call AI anything where the computer does something where the result isn’t obvious. Which quite nicely covers also computational photography. Even the “dumb” HDR has to do non-trivial things to yield good results (and e.g. scene understanding may help).
8 Likes
This topic was automatically closed 180 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.