Whereas I agree with the first part that doesn’t mean there is no damage to human health from 5G or rather higher frequencies. Human health is not a measurable criteria only a relative one so as people adapt and become more used to certain pressures they may survive. That’s not a good definition of health as people can be healthy in prison but that’s no reason to promote crime.
For those who may have concerns the frequencies 5G use can be lower than some 4G
- The band numbers reference the same frequency in 4G or 5G. The prefix n is just there to denote it is also used for 5G
- The only 5G bands that use higher frequencies than 4G are n77/n78 at 3.5GHz and 3.6Gh respectively
- n7 and n41 use 2.6GHz and 2.5Ghz (4G and 5G)
Sure @UPPERCASE this is a community forum but as this post was created by Fairphone the company you should be safe from that criticism.
But asking about WiFi-6 
Oh dear that’s stretching it a bit.
Though I suppose it does challenge the first part of the topic ‘Future proof’ how much of the future and who’s future??
UPDATE:
And no sooner had I sent this post I found a new post about WiFi-7
This future thing is weighing heavily on the present which in a moment will be the past.