The 700 MHz bands will be deployed in France, then I hope to be able to use it with an FP2 after the update (in the near future) of a module, or should I move to another product ?
700MHz is a lower frequency so it can have a wider range. This means there would be more 4G coverage in rural areas without placing new masts. In cities, where networks can be crowded it is also an advantage to have more bands so the users can be distributed over the bands.
The Fairphone will continue to use 1800 and 2600 MHz, and if those are out of reach your phone will likely switch to 3G. Free already introduced 700MHz LTE in September according to Wikipedia, so I don’t see why this should change now.
I just googled a bit longer: You are totally right.
It would be interesting to know if Fairphone 2 supports LTE-A which seems to toggle between signals from the 1800 or the 2600 MHz band and vice-versa when offered from the provider.
Thank you for restating my question. I understand that in an area where only the 700MHz is accessible (therefore not the 1800MHZ or the 2600MHz), the Fairphone 2, with no possibility of evolution, will not connect to “Free” which only works in these 3 bands . This, until the arrival of a hypothetical Fairphone 3.
There won’t be many areas with only 700. There’s also 3G on 900MHz which is supported and also has a large range. There are still many phones around not supporting all bands, or not supporting 4G at all, so you’ll almost always be able to connect to 3G in case other 4G bands are unavailable - and the FP2 does so automatically. And that’s mostly the case for remote areas, near larger towns you should always find 4G.
There won’t be many areas with only 700. There’s also 3G on 900MHz which is supported and also has a large range. There are still many phones around not supporting all bands, or not supporting 4G at all, so you’ll almost always be able to connect to 3G in case other 4G bands are unavailable - and the FP2 does so automatically. And that’s mostly the case for remote areas, near larger towns you should always find 4G.
There is already 3G (or even 2G on other networks tham Free) on 900MHz which is a low frequency as well, with about the same range. If you cannot receive that either then you are just living too far from the mast, and 700MHz won’t help much.
There are three antennae Free Mobile in my neighborhood, respectively 220, 290 and 550m in walking distance from my place (and waves don’t walk, so they are closer). I can see one of them.
I’m in roaming with Orange, too and the nearest antennae is 550m from here, on the same building with Free Mobile. I don’t understand how i have problem so close from all of them.
I understand you’re living in an urban area. In that case, you don’t want bands with a long range at all, that creates too much interference with many masts close to each other. Either the networks are overcrowded or your house is insulated too well, and in both cases low frequency bands are not a very effective solution. It can take some strain off other bands by letting a few users use 700, but that’s about it.
20th District of Paris. Lots of buildings 5-7 stories, some big buildings, top of the hill and 5th floor, windows everywhere. Sometimes it is better down in the streets. Networks changing all the time from E, 3G or 4G. Even the femtocells in the box don’t help much, loosing connections and missed called everyday.
It’s puzzled me for years, dumb phones, smartphones, 3 different operators, each no good.