What exactly do you mean with bigger backside?
I’ll add stronger battery to the list. I don’t think you can replace modules in a modular phone with bigger modules.
What exactly do you mean with bigger backside?
I’ll add stronger battery to the list. I don’t think you can replace modules in a modular phone with bigger modules.
A stronger Battery could be larger in its dimensions, so it would extend from the Backside and the original Backcover won’t fit. This leads to a larger backside-cover
Oooh.
So you want a phone with a hump?
Or a huge battery with a hump
I remember such batteries for older HTC and Samsungs They came with a new back cover and were very popular…
I had to research for a picture because I couldn’t really imagine how this would look.
Here it is:
This one should be obvious: Future updates to the modules with (then) current components (i.e. better camera, faster processor, more RAM, etc.)
You are right, that’s probably obvious, but thanks for pointing it out.
I also added E-reader display and solar panel for power saving purposes.
Maybe a back with a built in flip-cover.
Would an infrared emitter/sensor back cover be possible? You could use your phone for TVs, sound systems and other stuff
It could be nice if there are an alternative mainboard (the central part of the phone) with a totally open chipset. I am sure that this kind of chipset could be lesser powerful if compared to a closed one, but I think that it could be very interesting for a lot of (advanced) users.
@deedend Are you talking about open hardware or about hardware that supports open/free software?
In the first case do you know of a open hardware chipset? In the second case: We don’t know yet how open/closed the source code for the FP2 will be. There is a chance that we will be able to install all kinds of FOSS operating systems on the FP2, so let’s wait until we know more.
@huskers Sorry I meant to answer you sooner: Are you talking about a remote-control with real keys on the back cover? Wouldn’t it be better/easier to simply add a infrared sensor and make an app that can be used as a remote control?
That’s what I meant. Didn’t think about the exact meaning of the English ‘remote control’ when I wrote that post
[quote=“paulakreuzer, post:24, topic:6846, full:true”]
@deedend Are you talking about open hardware or about hardware that supports open/free software?
In the first case do you know of a open hardware chipset? In the second case: We don’t know yet how open/closed the source code for the FP2 will be. There is a chance that we will be able to install all kinds of FOSS operating systems on the FP2, so let’s wait until we know more.[/quote]
I refer at this answer of Paul Kocialkowski at an user that ask him if there will be a Replicant version for Fairphone; the alternatives could be i.MX6, OMAP4/5 or Allwinner.
I also would appreciate if there will be a fairphone variant with a hardware keyboard (like a integrated slider) in future. It’s much more convenient than a external bluetooth keyboard (or any other wireless connectivity). Especially on travel it’s essential.
I have the feeling that we don’t nearly exploit the full creative potential that the modularity and expandability of Fairphone 2 offer.
Don’t get me wrong: I like the wishlist above and see many sensible wishes. However I deem all of them standard or even boring. Are we not able to come with more creative stuff?
Like what? A kitchen machine module? A lightsaber module? A teleportation module?
If I knew, I would suggest something awesome and not whine.
This seems like a very good start. Maybe a little impractical though