I do understand but it’s a Fairphone in terms of mineral extraction and factory works, it’s not a Sustphone.
Sure if both could be achieved it would resolve your problem with the FP4 etc.
Maybe they can come up with a module to replace the cameras one day, but I doubt it. Can you imagine the amount of work for a few special customers.
It may be possible to remove that camera module and make one that fits with two jacks, and then connect it to the speaker output, incorporating a switch even.
That seems more sustainable that asking someone else to do it or expect Fairphone to bow to the whims of consumers.
If I get an FP4 and the cameras go duff I my try it myself. How complicated can it be ~ just time and effort ~ like I will never have anything more pressing to do.
I am an engineer, only a civil engineer, not a mechanical engineer, but due to some lectures in mechanics at least my knowledge is good enough to understand, that plugging in a straight USB-plug into the weak USB-connector might end up in a malfunctioning connector in a very short time, while the headphone jack (90° angle) is much more durable due to the much lower torsional moment.
OK, the USB-connector might be replaceable, but I guess that 10 connectors/year can’t be counted as sustainable.
All my last several headphones and earbuds have had straight connectors, 90° angle mini-jacks aren’t something I have seen very often. You can get 90° angle USB-C adapters as well, but for me it is personally more convenient to have one that is straight, as I will just place it with the cabel coming up from my pocket.
I use straight jacks and have no problem, but using the USB port no thanks, maybe on occasion when it’s resting on a table.
One thing about the jack is that the wiring is simple, find a new jack and could almost replace one myself, rather not do a USB
Yes I take issue with that it’s a fairer future for everyone Someone somewhere is always paying the price for my comforts whether I prefer Jack or Bluetooth.
I’ve used both and will probably continue as long as it’s possible to encourage sustainable working practices. I can sleep a little easier, with less rum to wash away the dirty memories of my exploitations, knowing Fairphone are doing what they can.
Ideally all products would be priced so that people who source the materials and manufacture the products are paid and treated fairly. I would liken the Fairphone’s higher price to paying taxes, it’s the cost of living in a civilized society. I think it is a fair trade-off for me personally
Since more than 5 years I have been using my Fairphone 2 now and only because this buttom module is not available I might have to switch to a new device. I have had a look at Fairphone 4 recently and and have come to the conclusion that I will not buy it. I would be prepared to go and get a new cable for the charger but I will not want to buy a wireless headset, I have never liked them, the need to be charged again and again and I do not like the bluetooth rediation that close to my ear.
So GOOD BUY FAIRPHONE
Hi @lutzundliebe and welcome to the forum, although it seems it may be not be visiting anytime soon.
You do know that you don’t have to buy a bluetooth head set, you can use an adapter to the USB port and the USB port is a single user replaceable part for those worried about extra stress on it from using it.
My experience is just the opposite: no one in may family and in my workplace I saw using wireless headphones. On the street I do see several people using wireless earphones, especially iphone users.
However, even were the batteries replaceable or rechargeable, the additional electronics and circuitry AND the need of more batteries would, alone, produce more waste, both at the production line and at the dump yard.
Plus, adapters and dongles are prone at getting lost, dropped, damaged, forgotten, stolen… all of which causes people to buy several of them for the same set of smartphone.